REVIEWER'S GUIDE

As a reviewer for Journal of Practical Management Studies, your role is crucial in maintaining the quality and integrity of published research. Your expertise and objective evaluation play a vital part in ensuring the advancement of scientific knowledge. This reviewer guidance aims to provide you with a framework for conducting a comprehensive review that will help enhance the quality of the manuscripts submitted to the journal.

Key Components of a Review:

  1. Summary: Begin your review with a concise summary of the manuscript, highlighting its main objectives, methodology, findings, and contributions. This summary will provide the editors with an initial impression and help them understand your perspective.

  2. Structure and Clarity: Assess the overall organization and clarity of the manuscript. Evaluate if the structure is logical, the language is clear and concise, and if the arguments and findings are presented coherently.

  3. Methodology and Analysis: Evaluate the appropriateness of the methodology used, ensuring it is rigorous and supports the research objectives. Consider the validity and reliability of the data, the statistical analysis, and the interpretation of results.

  4. Originality and Contribution: Assess the novelty and significance of the research. Determine if the findings contribute to existing knowledge, advance the field, or address a research gap. Consider the implications and potential impact of the research.

  5. References and Citations: Review the accuracy and completeness of the reference list, ensuring all relevant sources are properly cited. Check for any missing citations or excessive self-citations that may raise concerns about bias.

  6. Ethical Considerations: Evaluate the ethical aspects of the research, such as potential conflicts of interest, adherence to ethical guidelines, and proper handling of human or animal subjects. Report any concerns to the editors.

  7. Constructive Feedback: Provide specific, constructive, and actionable feedback to the authors, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses. Offer suggestions for improvement, additional experiments, or further analysis, as appropriate.

Conclusion: By following this reviewer guidance, you can contribute to the scientific community by ensuring the publication of high-quality research. Your thoughtful and unbiased evaluation will help authors improve their work, facilitate scientific progress, and uphold the standards of the journal.

Remember, your expertise as a reviewer is valued, and your thorough evaluation is essential in maintaining the credibility and impact of scientific research. Thank you for your contribution to the scholarly community.